- 1-1-2 Inspire
- Posts
- 1-1-2 Inspire: When we disagree on what a relationship deserves
1-1-2 Inspire: When we disagree on what a relationship deserves
Edition #54

Hi there, I’m Aarti, Founder and Lead Counsellor at Incontact.
One of the gifts of working closely with people is that conversations in the therapy room sometimes illuminate something in my own life too.
Not because the experience is unfamiliar, but because another person’s struggle can sometimes give language to something I have lived or felt without ever naming quite so clearly.
I had one of those realisations recently while working with someone through the loss of a close relationship. It made me think about my own experiences of relationships changing, breaking down, or becoming something very different from what they once were.
I realised that I am, by nature, a salvager.
If a relationship has mattered deeply to me, my instinct is usually to ask:
Is there something meaningful here that can still be preserved?
But the more interesting realisation was this:
Not everyone believes relationships should be handled that way.
1 Story — Two very different ways of valuing a relationship
When an important relationship stops working, we often assume the disagreement is about what happened.
Who hurt whom.
Who tried harder.
Who withdrew.
Who should apologise.
Whether the friendship, partnership, or family relationship can be repaired.
Sometimes it is.
But there can be another disagreement underneath it—one that is much harder to see because we rarely talk about it explicitly.
Some people instinctively believe that if a relationship has once brought love, companionship, growth, belonging, or meaning into their lives, it is worth trying to preserve in some form.
Their first hope may be repair: to talk honestly, understand what went wrong, and see whether the closeness can be restored.
But even when that is no longer possible, they may still want to recalibrate the relationship rather than lose it completely.
A friendship that once involved daily conversations may become an intimate coffee once a month.
People who were once central to each other’s lives may become less intimate but still remain connected.
A close work relationship may end professionally while retaining warmth and mutual respect.
For someone who thinks this way, there is meaning in honouring the history of a relationship even when its present form has changed.
That is one way of valuing relationships.
There is another.
Some people believe relationships can have a natural course.
They can have been deeply meaningful, loving, and important, and still reach a point where continuing to hold onto them no longer feels right.
For them, letting go does not necessarily erase what came before.
A graceful ending can itself be a form of respect.
The relationship mattered. It shaped them. It gave something valuable. And its ending does not invalidate any of that.
Neither position is inherently more caring or more resilient.
The difficulty arises when these two values meet inside the same relationship.
The salvager may think:
How can something that mattered this much simply be allowed to disappear? Why aren’t you willing to fight for it?
The person who believes in letting go may wonder:
Why are we trying to keep something alive when it has clearly changed? Why can’t we appreciate what it was and accept that its course is over? And why do we need vulnerable, intimate conversations around the change?
Now the rupture carries an additional layer of pain.
The salvager can experience the other’s withdrawal as abandonment, indifference, or proof that the relationship did not mean as much to them.
The person trying to leave may experience repeated attempts to reconnect as an inability to accept reality or respect their decision.
Each person is interpreting the other’s response through their own value system.
And that can create a great deal of unnecessary self-blame.
When someone we love walks away, we can spend a long time asking:
Why wasn’t I worth another attempt?
How could they give up so easily?
Did the relationship mean less to them than it did to me?
Sometimes those questions are valid.
But sometimes we are trying to explain a difference in relational values as though it were evidence of our worth.
Recognising that possibility can give us another way to understand what has happened.
It allows us to separate the pain of the ending from the conclusion that the other person’s way of handling it must mean they cared less.
It can work in the other direction too.
If we are someone who can recognise when a relationship has run its course, we may find another person’s attempts to preserve it frustrating or intrusive.
Understanding that they may be acting from a deeply held value—not simply refusing to move on—can change the way we interpret their behaviour.
This does not mean every relationship should be salvaged.
Salvaging is not an instruction to tolerate repeated disrespect, serious boundary violations, or harm.
Nor does recognising someone’s preference for graceful endings mean we have to agree with it.
It simply means there may be something useful in asking a different question.
Not only:
What happened between us?
But also:
What do each of us believe should happen to an important relationship when it stops being what it once was?
That answer may tell us more than we expect.
1 Insight — The values beneath an ending
We often assume that people who care deeply about each other will also agree on what to do when a relationship changes.
They may not.
One person may experience love as a reason to repair or preserve some version of the relationship, while another may experience love and respect as compatible with letting it end gracefully.
Recognising this as a possible clash of values does not remove the loss.
But it can help us understand it without automatically translating another person’s choice into abandonment, indifference, or a verdict on our worth.
2 Tools
Tool 1 — Look for the pattern
Think about how you—and the other person—have handled difficult relationships in the past.
Do you tend to repair, recalibrate, and maintain a thread of connection?
Or are you more comfortable accepting that some relationships complete their course?
Then consider whether this is a one-off response to this particular relationship or part of a broader pattern.
Understanding the pattern may help you distinguish what happened between the two of you from the values each of you brought into it.
Tool 2 — Ask before there is a rupture
With the relationships that matter most, consider asking:
When an important relationship changes or becomes difficult, do you usually believe in trying to preserve some version of it, or in recognising when its course has ended?
There is no ideal answer.
But it is a valuable thing to know about someone.
We spend a lot of time discovering whether the people close to us share our values around family, trust, loyalty, work, money, or love.
Perhaps there is another value worth understanding too:
What do we believe we owe a relationship that once mattered when it can no longer be what it was?
With warmth and care,
Aarti ❤️
Reply